AYAV? gg all

DML wrote:Why would we want a Hunter around with a bullet that could go into an innocent? I don't see how keeping Luke in the lurch 'creates leads'.

Even if it doesn't create leads, if we lynch him tomorrow, it means that a innocent doesn't get lynched and then we have tomorrow night for the seers to seer in hope they find another vamp. It's simply really.

Oh and cousin.....NOOOOOOO!

Somebody Else's Problem wrote:

The Alchemist Penguin wrote:

Somebody Else's Problem wrote:DEATH TO LUKE_25!

Do we have any hunters left with bullets?

Killing him now, when we have no more leads, means we'll be forced to (most likely) lynch an innocent tomorrow.

Leaving him alive until the lynch gives us 24 hours to work on new leads.

And any bullets could potentially come in handy at a later date.

True.

He doesn't want the Vigi to kill me because he hasn't strawberry floating seered me!

I know I'm not the best player, but I can't believe I'm being used like this. Never playing this game again, it's a strawberry floating popularity contest.

What happens when a seer see's a Count?

DML wrote:Oh and cousin.....NOOOOOOO!

what?

Somebody Else's Problem wrote:

DML wrote:

StayDead wrote:I said DML was untrustworthy. Why is he so adamant we waste our vigi bullet?

Its not a waste - its killing a Vampire!

A vampire that's going to die either way tomorrow anyway.

Its the correct decision as long as that bullet doesn't kill an innocent, or if the Vigi doesn't die before gettinbg the chance to use it. There is an element of gamble in what you are saying.

Rubix wrote:What happens when a seer see's a Count?

They look human.

Rubix wrote:What happens when a seer see's a Count?

They are seen as a villager.

StayDead wrote:

DML wrote:Oh and cousin.....NOOOOOOO!

what?

Bombsheel time - PaperMacheMario is my cousin.

Nice of you to say that, AFTER he's dead. When we have no proof.

Nice way to try and save yourself.

DML wrote:

Somebody Else's Problem wrote:

DML wrote:

StayDead wrote:I said DML was untrustworthy. Why is he so adamant we waste our vigi bullet?

Its not a waste - its killing a Vampire!

A vampire that's going to die either way tomorrow anyway.

Its the correct decision as long as that bullet doesn't kill an innocent, or if the Vigi doesn't die before gettinbg the chance to use it. There is an element of gamble in what you are saying.

If we kill him now that means two random people go up for lynch tomorrow

If we wait till tomorrow everyone can vote and an innocent is saved.

Off for a bit. Dossier at the usual time.

I have to agree with everyone else, shooting Luke now is pointless, we know he's a Vampire and as such can lynch him tomorrow, shooting him now leaves us with the problem of who we should nominate for lynching as we have no other major leads as of this moment.

DML wrote:

StayDead wrote:

DML wrote:Oh and cousin.....NOOOOOOO!

what?

Bombsheel time - PaperMacheMario is my cousin.

Is he a fellow man of JUSTICE?

DML wrote:Its the correct decision as long as that bullet doesn't kill an innocent, or if the Vigi doesn't die before gettinbg the chance to use it. There is an element of gamble in what you are saying.

Just like to add this, again.

Pedz wrote:Even if it doesn't create leads, if we lynch him tomorrow, it means that a innocent doesn't get lynched and then we have tomorrow night for the seers to seer in hope they find another vamp. It's simply really.

Why waste a bullet and then lose an innocent tomorrow? Which is the most likely outcome.

Pedz wrote:

Rubix wrote:What happens when a seer see's a Count?

They are seen as a villager.

Oh gooseberry fool! that's going to make this game tougher than I thought

Luke_25 wrote:

Somebody Else's Problem wrote:

The Alchemist Penguin wrote:

Somebody Else's Problem wrote:DEATH TO LUKE_25!

Do we have any hunters left with bullets?

Killing him now, when we have no more leads, means we'll be forced to (most likely) lynch an innocent tomorrow.

Leaving him alive until the lynch gives us 24 hours to work on new leads.

And any bullets could potentially come in handy at a later date.

True.

He doesn't want the Vigi to kill me because he hasn't strawberry floating seered me!

I know I'm not the best player, but I can't believe I'm being used like this. Never playing this game again, it's a strawberry floating popularity contest.

So you're saying that someone who's already seered two vampires is obviously lying about you being a vampire. May I ask what you're basing this on?

Pedz wrote:

DML wrote:Its the correct decision as long as that bullet doesn't kill an innocent, or if the Vigi doesn't die before gettinbg the chance to use it. There is an element of gamble in what you are saying.

Just like to add this, again.

Pedz wrote:Even if it doesn't create leads, if we lynch him tomorrow, it means that a innocent doesn't get lynched and then we have tomorrow night for the seers to seer in hope they find another vamp. It's simply really.

Why waste a bullet and then lose an innocent tomorrow? Which is the most likely outcome.

Well we are going to lose an innocent in the Vamp kill anyway. Innocents are always going to die basically - I am not sure I agree withthe delay thats all. Its a chance to get lucky.

teh bork wrote:

Luke_25 wrote:

Somebody Else's Problem wrote:

The Alchemist Penguin wrote:

Somebody Else's Problem wrote:DEATH TO LUKE_25!

Do we have any hunters left with bullets?

Killing him now, when we have no more leads, means we'll be forced to (most likely) lynch an innocent tomorrow.

Leaving him alive until the lynch gives us 24 hours to work on new leads.

And any bullets could potentially come in handy at a later date.

True.

He doesn't want the Vigi to kill me because he hasn't strawberry floating seered me!

I know I'm not the best player, but I can't believe I'm being used like this. Never playing this game again, it's a strawberry floating popularity contest.

So you're saying that someone who's already seered two vampires is obviously lying about you being a vampire. May I ask what you're basing this on?

LIES!

DML wrote:

Pedz wrote:

DML wrote:Its the correct decision as long as that bullet doesn't kill an innocent, or if the Vigi doesn't die before gettinbg the chance to use it. There is an element of gamble in what you are saying.

Just like to add this, again.

Pedz wrote:Even if it doesn't create leads, if we lynch him tomorrow, it means that a innocent doesn't get lynched and then we have tomorrow night for the seers to seer in hope they find another vamp. It's simply really.

Why waste a bullet and then lose an innocent tomorrow? Which is the most likely outcome.

Well we are going to lose an innocent in the Vamp kill anyway. Innocents are always going to die basically - I am not sure I agree withthe delay thats all. Its a chance to get lucky.

Why lose 2 tomorrow though. We'd lynch one and the vamps would kill another. It makes no sense to me to use the bullet now. I think the vigi should use it on someone they think is dodgy