AYAV? gg all

DangChris xD wrote:He hasnt done anything suspicious though. :s Has he?

Not that I seen.

The only suspicious thing I seen was Pete's comment but that's been sorted

Zenigame wrote:So Twitter is basically laughing at us and then killing us.

It's an improvement.

I did find a reference to Ecno in the tweets but it's a bit out there -

Mmmmm. Aneurysm? I've always got blood on my brain. Signed The Thirst.

Ecno also stands for the Edinburgh Centre for Neuro-Oncology - http://www.neurooncology.scot.nhs.uk/jo ... &Itemid=41 - Bit of a long shot but I've seen worse leads followed.

There's not been any confirmation that there are vigilantes, or that it was a vigi kill - we've just been told that there are 'special roles'. So maybe the vampires were given the chance to forfeit their three vamp kills tonight (and allow Psykes to just pick three random inactive names from a hat) in order to have one kill, masquerading as a vigi, just to mess us up?

Zenigame wrote:So Twitter is basically laughing at us and then killing us.

Sounds like the greatest low-budget Horror movie ever.

PCCD wrote:Some tidbits from GR-Vampire's Twitter -

I warned. I called. Now, the answer will appear. If only the mist was as clear as I .

@Karlprof Just? Make the call and hear the answer. I feel what he feels.

These appear and then an hour later Call & Answer turns up dead. Karlprof's Tweets are also locked off to anyone but confirmed followers.

I don't know why it's tweeting at me - some kind of retribution for my (on the whole much better-written) Cadenati hijinks in AYAB?, perhaps. But take it from someone who's done this before, there's no real intelligence behind that Twitter account. I'll give Winckle a handjob if it's anything but button-pushing. EDIT: Note that the vampires may well try and lend it credence by killing off a couple of people it names, though - cause disruption and confusion. That's definitely the kind of thing we did last time I was a wolf.

And my tweets are locked because of privacy concerns (note that GR-Vampire cannot see my tweets himself, but may be a follower of mine on an alternate account). But feel free to follow me, I accept all GRcaders. I've not posted anything to do with AYAV? though!

Dan. wrote:There's not been any confirmation that there are vigilantes, or that it was a vigi kill - we've just been told that there are 'special roles'. So maybe the vampires were given the chance to forfeit their three vamp kills tonight (and allow Psykes to just pick three random inactive names from a hat) in order to have one kill, masquerading as a vigi, just to mess us up?

There was confirmation it was a vigi kill and the vampires also had their three kills, so, err, wrong on both counts .

Suspiciously wrong.

Crunched some numbers.

So far Aaron, Red, Roonmastor, and Diabolito haven't posted in this thread at all.

Jango has posted once.

People who have only posted twice (I won't bother naming 3 posts and above) are:
Cosmo
DaLax
Albear
Luke_25
Corazon de Leon
Delusibeta

Make of that what you will.

Zellery wrote:I'm sorry I still don't follow. Are you saying Mori is suspicious for always being the one replying to my aggressive posts or are you saying it's me that has the suspicious behaviour?

Sorry having a dense moment.

Neither, I'm just saying that your posting may well have caused the distinct lack of posting today.
Let's leave it there (in hindsight I never should have said something this pointless )

Karlprof wrote:

PCCD wrote:Some tidbits from GR-Vampire's Twitter -

I warned. I called. Now, the answer will appear. If only the mist was as clear as I .

@Karlprof Just? Make the call and hear the answer. I feel what he feels.

These appear and then an hour later Call & Answer turns up dead. Karlprof's Tweets are also locked off to anyone but confirmed followers.

I don't know why it's tweeting at me - some kind of retribution for my (on the whole much better-written) Cadenati hijinks in AYAB?, perhaps. But take it from someone who's done this before, there's no real intelligence behind that Twitter account. I'll give Winckle a handjob if it's anything but button-pushing.

And my tweets are locked because of privacy concerns (note that GR-Vampire cannot see my tweets himself, but may be a follower of mine on an alternate account). But feel free to follow me, I accept all GRcaders. I've not posted anything to do with AYAV? though!

I wasn't aware of that so fair does.

Cuttooth wrote:Crunched some numbers.

So far Aaron, Red, Roonmastor, and Diabolito haven't posted in this thread at all.

Jango has posted once.

People who have only posted twice (I won't bother naming 3 posts and above) are:
Cosmo
DaLax
Albear
Luke_25
Corazon de Leon
Delusibeta

Make of that what you will.

Roon, Albea, DaLax and Cora stand out as people that usually tend to post more.


Also this is Jango's only post:

Jango wrote:...

Cuttooth wrote:Crunched some numbers.

So far Aaron, Red, Roonmastor, and Diabolito haven't posted in this thread at all.

Jango has posted once.

People who have only posted twice (I won't bother naming 3 posts and above) are:
Cosmo
DaLax
Albear
Luke_25
Corazon de Leon
Delusibeta

Make of that what you will.

I don't at this stage, its the weekend and this has only been going for two days so maybe people are busy?

Deadpool hasn't been on since 1:00AM.

Paranoia is my only friend right now.

Oblomov Boblomov wrote:

Dan. wrote:There's not been any confirmation that there are vigilantes, or that it was a vigi kill - we've just been told that there are 'special roles'. So maybe the vampires were given the chance to forfeit their three vamp kills tonight (and allow Psykes to just pick three random inactive names from a hat) in order to have one kill, masquerading as a vigi, just to mess us up?

There was confirmation it was a vigi kill and the vampires also had their three kills, so, err, wrong on both counts .

Suspiciously wrong.

I know there have been three vampire kills - what I'm saying is that they weren't picked by the vampires, they were just inactives picked at random killed that the vamps had no choice in the matter, because they gave up that choice to stage a mock vigi kill instead. Just theorising.

EDIT: Also, there was never confirmation it was a vigilante kill. 'It seems we have a wannabe vigilante' can hardly count as confirmation, can it?

Dan. wrote:

Oblomov Boblomov wrote:

Dan. wrote:There's not been any confirmation that there are vigilantes, or that it was a vigi kill - we've just been told that there are 'special roles'. So maybe the vampires were given the chance to forfeit their three vamp kills tonight (and allow Psykes to just pick three random inactive names from a hat) in order to have one kill, masquerading as a vigi, just to mess us up?

There was confirmation it was a vigi kill and the vampires also had their three kills, so, err, wrong on both counts .

Suspiciously wrong.

I know there have been three vampire kills - what I'm saying is that they weren't picked by the vampires, they were just inactives picked at random killed that the vamps had no choice in the matter, because they gave up that choice to stage a mock vigi kill instead. Just theorising.

Psykes admitted it was a Vigilante kill by a villager didn't he?

Zellery wrote:

Dan. wrote:

Oblomov Boblomov wrote:

Dan. wrote:There's not been any confirmation that there are vigilantes, or that it was a vigi kill - we've just been told that there are 'special roles'. So maybe the vampires were given the chance to forfeit their three vamp kills tonight (and allow Psykes to just pick three random inactive names from a hat) in order to have one kill, masquerading as a vigi, just to mess us up?

There was confirmation it was a vigi kill and the vampires also had their three kills, so, err, wrong on both counts .

Suspiciously wrong.

I know there have been three vampire kills - what I'm saying is that they weren't picked by the vampires, they were just inactives picked at random killed that the vamps had no choice in the matter, because they gave up that choice to stage a mock vigi kill instead. Just theorising.

Psykes admitted it was a Vigilante kill by a villager didn't he?

No, he said "It seems we have a wannabe vigilante in our midst", or something very similar.

Dan. wrote:

Oblomov Boblomov wrote:

Dan. wrote:There's not been any confirmation that there are vigilantes, or that it was a vigi kill - we've just been told that there are 'special roles'. So maybe the vampires were given the chance to forfeit their three vamp kills tonight (and allow Psykes to just pick three random inactive names from a hat) in order to have one kill, masquerading as a vigi, just to mess us up?

There was confirmation it was a vigi kill and the vampires also had their three kills, so, err, wrong on both counts .

Suspiciously wrong.

I know there have been three vampire kills - what I'm saying is that they weren't picked by the vampires, they were just inactives picked at random killed that the vamps had no choice in the matter, because they gave up that choice to stage a mock vigi kill instead. Just theorising.

The tweets from that account would suggest different though. Making references to call & answer and Ecno (at a push) then those two turning up dead in the vampire kills would suggest they were allowed to pick who they offed tonight.

Been out all day and just caught up in double quick time.

Stupid vigi.

Hi Noes

Dan. wrote:I know there have been three vampire kills - what I'm saying is that they weren't picked by the vampires, they were just inactives picked at random killed that the vamps had no choice in the matter, because they gave up that choice to stage a mock vigi kill instead. Just theorising.

Ahh, I see. My apologies. Sykes said "It seems with(sic) have some sort of wannabe vigilante in our midst", which seems confirmation to me, but it is perhaps a little ambiguous.