Page 5 of 13

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 2:30 pm
by False
Frank wrote:I like how we the thread's got to five pages, and no-one yet has made a rebuttal to my point on page 2. Maybe I made it too calmly...


I cant see that? Maybe Im blind, but heres your rebuttal.

strawberry float YOU, YOU IDIOT YOU KNOW NOTHING!

Hows that?

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 2:31 pm
by Frank
That's better 8-)

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 2:33 pm
by Beans
Frank wrote:I like how we the thread's got to five pages, and no-one yet has made a rebuttal to my point on page 2. Maybe I made it too calmly...

I thought you knew everyone just ignores you Frank....
;)

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 2:34 pm
by Frank
I thought it was just the movie threads where that happened :(

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 2:35 pm
by Moggy
Frank wrote:I thought it was just the movie threads where that happened :(


The Umbrellas of Cherbourg. :x

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 2:36 pm
by Frank
Still haven't watched it 8-)

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 2:37 pm
by Moggy
Frank wrote:Still haven't watched it 8-)


:x

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 3:13 pm
by Octoroc
Frank wrote:PC's aren't too great for local multiplayer.

You're dead right there Frank.

Let's not forget they are good for making those games that many millions of people enjoy playing on consoles and I must admit I love a bit of Freecell.

And let's not forget the great feelings of pride that PCs can instill. Just the other week, my PC was crashing everytime I right-clicked in Explorer, but weirdly only in directories on the C: drive. It only took me a few hours to fix that* and when I had, boy I felt so smart! So much better than playing some crappy game. You don't get that sense of achievement with boring consoles that "just work".

*I cleaned out my registry and then pain-stakingly went through my third-party shell extensions until I found the culprit. It was that new version of Tortoise GIT all the time! Cleaning out the registry also fixed a weird JPEG decoding bug that I was having in a GUI authoring tool. Bonus! That's my cool story du jour.

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 3:15 pm
by Drunken_Master
Octoroc wrote:
Frank wrote:PC's aren't too great for local multiplayer.

You're dead right there Frank.

Let's not forget they are good for making those games that many millions of people enjoy playing on consoles and I must admit I love a bit of Freecell.

And let's not forget the great feelings of pride that PCs can instill. Just the other week, my PC was crashing everytime I right-clicked in Explorer, but weirdly only in directories on the C: drive. It only took me a few hours to fix that* and when I had, boy I felt so smart! So much better than playing some crappy game. You don't get that sense of achievement with boring consoles that "just work".

*I cleaned out my registry and then pain-stakingly went through my third-party shell extensions until I found the culprit. It was that new version of Tortoise GIT all the time! Cleaning out the registry also fixed a weird JPEG decoding bug that I was having in a GUI authoring tool. Bonus! That's my cool story du jour.


You mug, you should have bought one of those Apple computers. I've heard those ones never break.

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 3:15 pm
by Beans
Frank wrote:I thought it was just the movie threads where that happened :(

:lol:

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 3:16 pm
by Qikz
I'm not sure how you can say PC is bad at local multiplayer. Lanning it up is one of the most fun activities you can do with your mates and also a lot of games have configs you can run just for splitscreen if you're that way inclined.

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 3:16 pm
by Jingle Ord The Way
Frank wrote:PC's aren't too great for local multiplayer.


Yeah, it's a hassle. However when people put their minds to it, it's awesome.
Image
Image

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 3:18 pm
by Trelliz
Octoroc wrote: So much better than playing some crappy game. You don't get that sense of achievement with boring consoles that "just work".


Don't forget the best part, in the event that said boring console doesn't work, you have literally no option other than to send it back and wait for Sony/Microsoft to fix it for you, as the vague error messages - "an error has occured" or "error: code 8390e09d897df98" - either offer no explanation as to the cause, or translate to "the magic box isn't working, but don't worry your pretty little head about it, send it back to us and we'll make it all better" rather than "hmm, the dvd drive's buggered. I'll get a new one and swap it out, as I selected the parts for and built this machine myself, therefore I know it quite literally inside and out, and am not treated like a child who can't handle such problems."

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 3:21 pm
by Octoroc
Drunken_Master wrote:You mug, you should have bought one of those Apple computers. I've heard those ones never break.


That was my work PC. I have a Mac Mini at home which is great although I wouldn't play games on it, I only bought it for making iOS applications. I also have a PC at home that kept switching itself off. There was no blue-screen-of-death just a "click!" and then oblivion. I've "fixed" that by opening the housing up and pointing a big desk fan at the motherboard. Seems to work. \o/

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 3:36 pm
by Harry Bizzle
Ord wrote:
Frank wrote:PC's aren't too great for local multiplayer.


Yeah, it's a hassle. However when people put their minds to it, it's awesome.
Image
Image



Now that you point it out, I've had a lot more fun playing CS 1.6, UT, and Command and Conquer with my mates in LAN cafes than I've ever had on console multiplayer.

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 3:48 pm
by False
In my secondry school we managed to hack Doom and Duke Nukem onto the PC via DOS install we managed to install alongside the Win XP install in the business studies rooms.

Doom LAN at lunchtime 8-)

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 3:50 pm
by Seven
The problem is that with LAN, it requires more than one PC in house to get it to work. However, being said - if you manage to pull it off it's amazing experience.

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 3:52 pm
by False
Some of the best multiplayer Ive ever played was with my dad and brother on Quake 2 via LAN.

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 3:56 pm
by Photek
Brerlappins little hat wrote:
Cal wrote:
Brerlappins little hat wrote:God damn youre a strawberry floating douchebag.


Insta-Ban requested.*










*alternatively, LOL. What a funny little person you are. Brer. Always so angry at me.


And i will continue to do so until you actually get a clue and stop posting like a strawberry floating mind cripple.

FEAR, IS THE MIND CRIPPLE!

Re: The PC vs Console Thread

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 4:05 pm
by Cal
Console Vs. PC Gaming

There is one topic that always seems to divide gamers: PC vs. console. People on either side vehemently and even viciously defend and justify their position. While many feel neutral toward the issue, the fact is that playing video games on a PC and on a console are two entirely different experiences, each with its own advantages and disadvantages.

Startup Cost

Assuming that a consumer starts with no previous equipment, getting a console is clearly the less expensive choice when starting out. Buying a high-end PC for competitive gaming can range well in excess of several thousand dollars, while gaming consoles such as the XBox 360 only require an initial investment of about $300 to $400 as of early 2011. Upgrading a standard home PC to gaming specifications can also be relatively expensive, depending on the parts required.

Maintenance Costs

PC tends to be considered the superior choice in matters of system upkeep. When a part in your computer is damaged, you can purchase and install a replacement within the same day. However, gaming consoles rarely have replacement parts available to the public, and opening the casing for maintenance voids any warranty still existing. The console can be sent for repairs, but this can take weeks and cost a considerable amount of money. Worse yet, if the console can't be fixed, you may have to replace it entirely.

Quality and Upgrades

A gaming console comes with preset hardware, designed to accomplish the console's needs. A high-end gaming PC can outpace a gaming console in terms of graphic quality, lag-reduction and smooth animation. Additionally, while many modern gaming consoles feature updates and downloadable content for their games, the hardware remains the same. Only when a major redesign is made can an upgrade be purchased, and even then, it means buying the upgraded console, not an upgraded part. With a PC, you can make hardware upgrades frequently.

Convenience

Setting up a gaming PC requires you to not only hook up the computer's components, but also ensure that your system meets a game's minimum requirements. Competitive gaming often also requires better than the minimum. This may require you to replace several parts before you can play. In contrast, the simple plug-in-and-play setup of the gaming console is relatively hassle-free and requires only a few minutes of setup to begin play.

Game Sharing and Used Games

If you want to lend your friend a console game, you can with almost no hassle. PC games, however, require a single-use license code to run, and so can't be shared. This also limits the ability to sell or buy used games, as the licensing codes can't be replaced or reset for resale. Console games can run on any console because they don't have a license code. This means you can loan them out, buy used copies or sell them.

Controls

The controls for a console system are limited to whatever hardware is designed for use with the console but are easy to learn across a wide spectrum of games. PC games allow players to tailor their use to any number of control systems, not just the mouse and keyboard. Depending on the game type, a keyboard may be preferable to a controller. Ultimately, the issue of controls is more about personal preference and the type of game being played.

Customization

Console games are very rigid in comparison to PC games due to their reliance on presets. All coding is already written into the game, and there is no way to edit the code. Also, while console controls may be editable depending on the game, many use presets that can be confining. With PC games, many developers offer tools to edit the game for your own purposes. These modifications can range from simply changing a character's appearance to creating an new area to explore. Also, the function of every key on the keyboard, or any other control scheme, can be tailored to fit the individual player.

Fair Competitive Play

For competitive gamers, the issue of fairness can be serious. All console players are on relatively even ground, depending on their skill level and the strength of their Internet connection. PC gamers are at the mercy of their systems and the systems of their opponents. A superior computer can give a significant advantage to a PC gamer, making competitive PC gaming less evenly matched than console gaming.

http://www.ehow.co.uk/info_8099233_cons ... aming.html


Cal says: Also, PC games are generally cheaper (often by a good £10) than their console equivalents. Funny how they forgot to mention that one.